City balks at Oakland A's funding plan for proposed $12 billion waterfront ballpark and development | San Francisco Chronicle
The Oakland A’s proposed 35,000-seat waterfront ballpark and accompanying mixed-use development is expected to cost at least $12 billion to build and inject nearly $1 billion into city coffers, according to documents released Friday.
But city officials were surprised by the A’s new plan, which proposes using tax-generated revenue from the site to fund infrastructure costs.Read More
A's nearly shut out in early comments on Howard Terminal ballpark plan | San Francisco Business Times
The Oakland Athletics won a ballgame 13-12 on Wednesday at RingCentral Coliseum. They then lost 54-5 at the Oakland Planning Commission.
In three hours of comments on the adequacy of the draft environmental impact report for the A's waterfront ballpark project at Howard Terminal, 54 Oakland residents, environmentalists, shipping industry employees, law students and community activists roughed up the document pitched by city planners. They said the study and the overall development is incomplete, offers vague relief options and throws a curve to affordable housing, pollution, maritime jobs, transportation and other issues.Read More
The head of Amtrak’s Capitol Corridor (CCJPA) service, which runs trains between Sacramento and San Jose via Oakland, wants rail safety improvements to the designs of the Oakland A’s proposed ballpark development at Howard Terminal in Jack London Square. From a memo obtained by Streetsblog, written by Robert Padgette, Managing Director of the CCJPA:
"The proposed Oakland Waterfront Ballpark would be the only MLB stadium where patrons will cross the mainline heavy rail tracks at grade at all five nearby railroad crossings. Long freight trains can block multiple crossings regardless of the time of day, and these trains can sometimes be stationary for an extended period of time, during which roadway users (motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists) would have no access across the tracks and may be tempted to navigate around crossing gate arms and the stationary train unsafely. What behaviors patrons will exhibit before or after events in such a scenario has grave implications for the safety and operations of trains along the entire CCJPA route."
A real estate development plan that includes a new park for the Oakland Athletics has set up a battle with the team and its supporters – including Mayor Libby Schaaf — against a coalition of labor unions, trucking companies, heavy industry and environmental groups who say it would eliminate jobs at the port, increase car and truck traffic in the neighborhood and create environmental hazards.Read More
The A’s believe their Howard Terminal ballpark project is eco-conscious. Environmental groups are skeptical | The Athletic
Last August, shortly after the A’s filed a lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court against the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), A’s president Dave Kaval sent out a series of tweets. The lawsuit alleged that DTSC had failed to implement the state’s Hazardous Waste Law against Schnitzer Steel, a steel manufacturing and scrap metal recycling company with a facility in West Oakland. Kaval’s tweets expressed concern about the impact of Schnitzer’s actions on the soil and water within the community, which he said could lead to fires. He deemed it unacceptable.
“We want to be part of the solution,” Kaval tweeted. “Environmental stewardship is core to our commitment to Oakland. We are doing this with our groundbreaking environmental justice legislation to improve air quality, reduce car trips by 20% & address sea level rise.”Read More
The city of Oakland released its draft environmental impact report for the A’s Howard Terminal project last Friday, a behemoth of a document that is upwards of a few thousand pages long. As we enter a 45-day public comment period, which will address potential weaknesses in the document before a city council vote, it’s worth taking a hard look at the transportation section.Read More
When the A’s hopes of building a stadium at Oakland’s Laney College fell through in 2017, the team quickly shifted gears and began planning a new ballpark at Howard Terminal.
In the time they’ve spent pitching the waterfront stadium to the city and fans, the team has promoted a rosy outlook on the project’s viability. And even though this ambitious undertaking — which also includes housing, office and retail space — presents an array of complications, the A’s seemed confident heading into 2020 that they would be able to move into their new home for the 2023 season.Read More
Clock ticking on A's Howard Terminal ballpark dream, and stakes couldn't be bigger | San Francisco Chronicle
A Bay Area swim coach used to explain to her swimmers the most important principle of their sport by using this timely reminder:
“Ticky-tocky goes the clocky.”
That should be the A’s mantra for their efforts to build a new ballpark.
Last week the A’s appeared to clear a big hurdle in their quest to build a future home at Howard Terminal. A judge dismissed a lawsuit that would have bogged down their stadium timeline.
Hurdle skimmed? Sort of. Except that the group of entities filing the suit, which includes Schnitzer Steel, immediately appealed the ruling. Even if the A’s eventually prevail, the appeal could be another setback to their construction schedule.Read More
SSA Marine Brings in the West Coast’s Largest Cranes to its OICT Terminal in the Port of Oakland | Hellenic Shipping News
The three largest ship-to-shore container cranes on the U.S. West Coast now reside at the Oakland International Container Terminal (OICT).
SSA Marine, the operator of OICT, purchased these cranes from the world’s leading crane manufacturer, ZPMC. The cranes can work containers 24 wide while accommodating up to 14 high on deck. The new cranes will compliment four existing cranes which were recently raised, providing OICT a full arsenal of cranes capable of serving the largest container ships transiting the Pacific Ocean. These three new cranes will replace three older generation cranes as OICT will have ten cranes servicing its five-berth facility.Read More
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
When the Warriors lost an appeal last week that would have allowed them to skirt repayment of their $45 million debt to the Oakland Coliseum Authority, Alameda County and Oakland taxpayers breathed a sigh of relief. But little did they know just this past October Alameda County set itself up for the same risk when it sold its half of the Oakland Coliseum property to the A’s for $85 million without any condition that the team stay in Oakland or provide any community benefit to the East Oakland community.
Now, the city of Oakland is also contemplating the sale of its half of the Coliseum property to the A’s, without applying conditions to protect taxpayers and demanding the A’s stay in East Oakland.Read More